0 of 0 people found the following review helpful:
|
hacker, Oct 31, 2008
|
reviewer: Anonymous
from Wales, WI USA
|
| I was a member for 3 years prior to this course going public. It demands control off the tee box and a sharp short game as most of the greens are crowned. General condition is average/aove average with the greens being firm and quick. The bunkers could use some work; depth of sand can vary. 6500 yards from the back tees may sound short, however the tree lined fairways and multitude of hazzards make Rolling Hills a true test of golf. The course can have drainage issues, so if you plan to play after a strong rain (2+in.) I would call first. Overall an enjoyable round of golf that will challenge the best player. |
| |
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful:
|
Member, May 29, 2006
|
reviewer: Alex
from Oconomowoc, WI USA
|
| This golf course has two completely different nines. The front nine plays extremely long with a 205 par 3, followed by a 440 yard par 4 with o.b. left.
The back nine, however is completely different, with a 499 yard par 5 and a 320 par 4.
This course demands controled teeshots with length in order to shoot low. |
| |
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
|
From someone who knows, Apr 13, 2004
|
reviewer: Anonymous
from Madison, WI
|
| I've worked at La Belle for years...it no longer has 5 par 3s, as the description says, it now has 4. The course is growing up nicely, every year it's more challanging because of tree growth and overall improvement by our superintendant. If you have the chance to play La Belle- take it, you wont regret it. |
| |